Logs Explorer & multiverse map

​

Exploring the multiverse

When you test with Antithesis, we run your software many times to find unexpected behaviors in your code. The Logs Explorer and the multiverse map allow you to visualize and search across this multitude of execution paths, empowering you with a deeper understanding of what’s happening in the system under test. With the Logs Explorer you can:

• Investigate production events in a powerful simulation
• Visualize when and where events occur in a test run
• Improve your testing by identifying gaps

​

Launching the Logs Explorer

Every triage report contains an “Explore logs” button that launches a Logs Explorer for that test run. Alternatively, you can always go to <tenant>.antithesis.com/search and enter the session ID for a particular run – the session ID is at the bottom of each triage report.

​

Event search

The Logs Explorer includes a search interface for events and a log viewer. You can:

• Search the multiverse for any event: literal text, regular expressions, numbers, or booleans for any fields produced by the test run. You can also
• Search for a set of events using logical search patterns and temporal queries — event X but only when preceded by event Y.

Clicking on any search result will bring up the full log history for that execution path, and you can kick off a multiverse debugging session from the log viewer.

​

The multiverse map

The multiverse map is a visualization of a complete Antithesis test run. After starting a search, switch to the Map tab on the event search for this view (you’ll need to click search to make this render). Right click on the explorer for zoom and view options. Each branch on this tree is a distinct timeline, in which Antithesis explores a different execution path through your system. This page provides a deeper explanation of the multiverse Antithesis builds in each test run. Instances of the events you searched for appear as dots. Search for particular events like fault types to understand how frequently they occurred, or search for specific log lines followed by faults to see how often a particular function encounters a fault condition. Clicking on any dot brings up the corresponding logs.

​

Common workflows

​

Investigate something you saw in production

Use case: You saw an ominous log line in production but didn’t have enough information to troubleshoot. Antithesis runs your software in a simulation that’s much more hostile than production, and doing so in massively parallel fashion. Therefore, any rare event you encounter in production very likely appears multiple times in an Antithesis test run, making it easier to investigate and debug. You can search for any line from your production logs, and layer in additional searches to reveal correlations with other events. Temporal relationships, where event X is PRECEDED_BY event A or event X is NOT PRECEDED_BY event B, can be especially helpful. To debug further you can launch a multiverse debugging session and replay the bug as it happens in the test run. You can (and really should) also convert the event to a test property so future test runs will return a finding if it fails – either using our SDKs, or by talking to one of our customer success engineers.

​

Audit new changes under test

Use case: You want to observe the behavior of some new code changes under test and improve test coverage. If your new changes are on a feature branch, you can run a one-off ephemeral test. Let’s say you want to improve test coverage for leader elections in your database. Search for leader election events and to see how frequently they happen, and how early or late in the test run. Say you find leader elections too infrequently in the test run. You click through the leader election event logs and see that the leader election happened when 5 out of 9 nodes are dead. You can now search for node kill events to see if they’re happening as frequently as you expect. If there are too few node kills, you might need more aggressive faults. If you see a good number of node kills then maybe you need more test scenarios with few nodes, to trigger more leader elections.